July 02, 2009 09:29 am
—
The figures are a year old and don’t reflect the impact of the recession, but Census estimates released Wednesday show that most local communities had population growth from July 1, 2007 to July 1, 2008.
The estimate shows Goshen has reached a population of 32,630, up from 32,247 on July 1, 2007. Elkhart, the county’s largest city, also showed a population gain, growing from 52,446 on July 1, 2007 to 52,663 on July 1, 2008.
Just two local towns had population declines, and those were slight. Milford’s population fell by eight people to 1,513. The population of Syracuse fell by 14 to 2,995.
And the small town of Shipshewana in LaGrange County grew, but by just two people.
The Census Bureau compiles population estimates for incorporated places annually.
Indiana
New census figures show that Indiana’s fastest-growing communities this decade are concentrated in suburban Indianapolis.
An analysis by Indiana University’s Indiana Business Research Center found that Fishers has gained the most residents since 2000. The Census Bureau estimates that last year Fishers had a population of 69,011 — an 80 percent jump in eight years.
Other Indianapolis suburbs with large growth rates in that time are Noblesville (43.4 percent), Greenwood (30.9 percent) and Carmel (25.2 percent).
Indianapolis has grown by 2.1 percent to an estimated 798,382 people, while Fort Wayne remained virtually unchanged from the decade’s start at 251,591 as the state’s second-largest city.
Nation
Reversing a decade-long trend, many of the largest U.S. cities are now growing more quickly than the rest of the nation, yet another sign of an economic crisis that is making it harder for people to move.
Census data released Wednesday highlight a city resurgence in coastal regions and areas of the Midwest and Northeast, due to a housing crunch, recession and higher gas prices that have slowed migration to far-flung suburbs and residential hotspots in the South and West.
The 2008 population figures show New York and Chicago made gains from higher births, while Philadelphia stanched population losses from earlier in the decade. Also showing rebounds were industrial centers in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn., Columbus, Ohio, and Lincoln, Neb., with economies focused on finance, health care, information technology or education. Detroit, with its ailing auto industry, declined.
Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle and Portland, Oregon, all on the West Coast, registered growth, boosted partly by foreign-born immigrants who moved into and stayed in gateway cities. In contrast, former hotspot areas in Nevada and Arizona had significant slowdowns, as well as inland regions in California.
“Cities are showing a continued vitality as hubs of activity even as some suburban and exurban areas go through tough times,” said William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution. “It emphasizes the buoyancy of large established cities with diverse economies and populations.”
Frey and other demographers said many of the population shifts could be longer-lasting. They noted that while the Sunbelt region is still growing, it is unlikely to return to the torrid growth rates of earlier in the decade before the housing bubble burst.
President Barack Obama has pledged to upgrade mass transit and push energy conservation, high-speed rail and other urban priorities. That could create shifts in residential patterns and city life, especially for younger couples and small families more likely to move.
“Suburban sprawl may not be dead, but it’s certainly on hiatus,” said Mark Mather, associate vice president of the nonprofit Population Reference Bureau. “Even if the economy recovered tomorrow, it might take a while for people to change their behavior. Attitudes just don’t change overnight.”
Robert E. Lang, co-director of the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech, predicted that upscale, inner suburbs with developed transit systems will see bigger gains in the future.
Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.