By SHERIFF BRAD ROGERS
After the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting, a lot of questions were focused toward school administrators and law enforcement officials alike, including your sheriff, as to what should be done to protect the children in our schools.
All good questions.
All potential solutions should be on the table to discuss and strategize effectively and efficiently to protect what I deem is our greatest treasures — our children.
Contrary to what some would want you to think, school shootings are rare. School violence is not. Any school plan and infrastructure improvement should include not only a possible school shooting, but someone causing a disruption, someone with a knife, hostage situations, a trespasser, custody disputes, and troubled children that could become violent, all without becoming a police state.
A paradigm shift is necessary in our school administrators and our community as we prepare for violence and what we typically view as acceptable security in schools.
According to Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, author and speaker about violence in America, we spend millions of dollars on fire safety equipment when we build or upgrade schools — a prudent thing to do.
But do you know how many kids have been killed by school fire, in North America, in the last 50 years? Zero.
In 1999, the year of the Columbine school shooting, school violence claimed what at the time was an all time record number of kid’s lives. In that year there were 35 dead and a quarter of a million serious injuries due to violence in the school.
In 2004, we had a record 48 dead in the schools by violence.
Lt. Col. Grossman makes a valid point, in that we have been resistant and in denial to spend or do what is necessary to protect our children. Our communities are now awakening from this denial. But will that awakening be enough?
Most recently I have met with school superintendents who are located outside of municipal limits to discuss strategy — a sheriff’s effort to partner with the community to solve a problem without dictating or overreaching on local school choices on which path to take.
The superintendents were pleased that law enforcement could provide a unique perspective that they would not necessarily think about.
School officials are understandably pressured by parents to “do something” to protect the children from a Sandy Hook-like incident. However, leaders should avoid spending money prematurely on security before researching the various options.
In and of themselves, cameras, locked doors, ID system for students and one school resource officer in the district are not the panacea to avoid school violence. For example, the SRO may be in a school other than where the violence occurs, sick, in training, or ominously they may be the first target of the gunman.
What is the answer? I do not have all the solutions. But law enforcement partnering with the schools is a start.
We need to look at barriers to unauthorized entry without turning our schools into prisons. We need to take advantage of technology.
Gun-free zones are kill zones. Arming all teachers is not the solution, but arming a few select, highly trained staff, that can conceal a firearm and pepper spray, know how to keep a firearm from children and how to act when law enforcement arrives on the scene, is something that should be on the table.
We protect our politicians with armed guards. Why not our vulnerable, precious children?
We need to empower teachers with the ability to defend themselves and our children through a variety of plans, to include something other than a lock-down, and wait as sitting-ducks, for an active shooter.
Firemen do a great job keeping our children safe from fire. Let’s work together to protect our greatest treasures from violence.
Ask the Sheriff column is published every two weeks. You can email Sheriff Brad Rogers your questions at email@example.com.