Goshen News, Goshen, IN

Letters to the Editor

January 15, 2014

A choice about freedom

Are we “freemen,” serfs or slaves? In Medieval times the services of a serf were preferred over that of a slave. For you see, a slave’s cost included provisions for housing, food and physical wellness. A serf provided for his own needs while paying taxes for access to the vassal lord’s land. If offered land ownership by the lord, he must consider if it was sufficient to meet his needs or if it was better to remain “non-free,” as a serf.

In recent years many have struggled trying to obtain the necessary provisions for themselves and their families. Being removed from the land leaves many dependent upon employment income or else community and government services.

Traditional 17th- and 18th-century economists realized capital only accumulates if given a surplus labor pool. Labor shortages lead to increased wage costs being passed on in the price of goods, resulting in destructive inflationary pressures. In the past, restrictive fiscal and monetary policies were employed to reduce economic growth whenever such low unemployment rates became evident.

Current economic conditions allow for record profits by some businesses enjoying low wage rates, possibly tax abatements and tax caps. Meanwhile, many families suffer from low incomes, reduced community services and possible loss of self worth.

Our world has limited life-sustaining capacities. What shall we do with those providing the necessary precondition for capital’s accumulation or those having insufficient incomes? Shall resources be available for all to be “freemen” or shall more become as Medieval serfs or slaves ... and “non-free?”

— Lynn Slagel


Text Only
Letters to the Editor

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
AP Video
Japan Landslide Rescuers Struggle in Heavy Rain Raw: Severe Floods, Fire Wrecks Indiana Homes Endangered Red Wolves Face Uncertain Future Raw: Russian Aid Convoy Arrives in Ukraine Hamm Talks Emmy Chances Okla. Policeman Accused of Sex Assaults on Duty Raw: Egypt Bus Crash Kills at Least 33 Two Bodies Found in Adjacent Yards Dominican Republic Bans Miley Cyrus Concert Raw: Israeli Air Strike in Gaza Raw: Rescue Efforts Suspended at Japan Landslide Raw: Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in Malaysia Raw: Smaller Marches in Ferguson Attorney: Utah Eatery Had Other Chemical Burn Farm Resurgence Grows With Younger Crowd Microbrewery Chooses Special Can for Its Beer Ky. Firefighters Hurt in Ice Bucket Challenge Federal Investigation Will Look at Use of Force Community Deals With Michael Brown Aftermath US: We Do Not Pay Ransom to Terrorists

Three Goshen elementary schools — Chandler, Chamberlain and West Goshen — are providing free meals to all students during the school year as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Community Eligibility Provision of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Nearly 80 percent of students at Chandler, 89 percent of students at Chamberlain and 78 percent of students at West Goshen already qualify for free or reduced-price lunches based on their family income. How do you feel about the new lunch program?

I think it’s a good idea to feed all the students free of charge
I think those who can afford it should pay for their school meals
I think all students should be required to pay for their school meals
     View Results