Goshen News, Goshen, IN

Letters to the Editor

November 28, 2012

LETTER: That giant sucking sound, again

Oh the outrage in Sunday’s editorial that Cequent’s management didn’t personally come to Goshen to explain their decision to move production to Mexico. Where’s the corresponding outrage at the other local companies who have had thousands of illegals employed over the years, thereby denying jobs to Americans and depressing area wages?

We’ve seen this story before with Johnson Controls fleeing to Mexico. Let’s put the blame where it belongs, NAFTA. The passage of NAFTA in 1994 was intended to eliminate trade barriers between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. By eliminating most tariffs, it fostered the growth in manufacturing in Mexico because of the reduced labor costs for companies relocating there. They also did not have to deal with all the cumbersome and costly governmental regulations for manufacturers in the U.S.  

An EPI briefing paper states that as of 2010, the trade deficits with Mexico totals $97.2 billion and has displaced a net 682,900 U.S. jobs. Prior to NAFTA, the U.S. had a $1.6 billion trade surplus with Mexico, supporting 29,400 jobs. Additionally, NAFTA made it attractive for companies all over the world to invest in Mexico to gain duty free access to the U.S. market. Of the 682,900 net displaced jobs, Indiana ranks second in the U.S. for these losses and the 3rd and 2nd and 6th congressional districts were hardest hit.

In Mexico, NAFTA was intended to generate a growing middle class but this has proven not to be so. The Mexican economy has failed in its promise to crate good quality jobs. Real salaries in Mexico remain below the levels of the early ’90s. NAFTA made Mexico a more attractive and safer location to invest and outsource U.S. manufacturing by eliminating many of the local regulations previously in place.

Remember Ross Perot? He was right.

— Bob Schrameyer



Text Only
Letters to the Editor

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
AP Video
Furry Roommates: Dorms Allowing Cats and Dogs Chase Rice Defends Bro-Country 'Jersey Shore Massacre' Pokes Fun at MTV Series Raw: Wash. Mudslides Close Roads, Trap Motorists DC's Godfather of Go-Go Honored Ukraine Calls Russian Convoy a 'direct Invasion' Girl Meets Her 'one in the World' Match Coal Gas Boom in China Holds Climate Risks Japan Landslide Rescuers Struggle in Heavy Rain Raw: Severe Floods, Fire Wrecks Indiana Homes Endangered Red Wolves Face Uncertain Future Raw: Russian Aid Convoy Arrives in Ukraine Okla. Policeman Accused of Sex Assaults on Duty Dominican Republic Bans Miley Cyrus Concert Raw: Israeli Air Strike in Gaza Raw: Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in Malaysia Attorney: Utah Eatery Had Other Chemical Burn

Three Goshen elementary schools — Chandler, Chamberlain and West Goshen — are providing free meals to all students during the school year as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Community Eligibility Provision of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Nearly 80 percent of students at Chandler, 89 percent of students at Chamberlain and 78 percent of students at West Goshen already qualify for free or reduced-price lunches based on their family income. How do you feel about the new lunch program?

I think it’s a good idea to feed all the students free of charge
I think those who can afford it should pay for their school meals
I think all students should be required to pay for their school meals
     View Results